Determinants of Didjeridu Style in Traditional and Popular Yolngu Song

ACCOMPANYING THE DREAMING

Didjeridu From Arnhem Land To Internet - Chapter Four

STEVEN KNOPOFF

Introduction

Alongside impressions of kangaroos, koalas, boomerangs and a vast out- back, the image and sound of the didjeridu has fixed itself in the minds of people around the world as a symbol of Australia and of Aboriginal culture. This has become all the more so in the past two decades. People who have never seen or heard a didjeridu in traditional performance contexts may have encountered it in movie soundtracks or in recordings by smah but increasing numbers of rock, jazz and new age artists who have taken up the instrument. As Peter Dunbar-Hall discusses elsewhere in this anthology, though often regarded as a pan-Aboriginal instrument, the didjeridu is probably indigenous only to certain areas of the north coast of the continent (Moyle, 19 8 1). The didjeridu is called by different names in the various cultures that use the instrument. The didjeridus played by the Yolngu residing at Yirrkala, Northeast Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, are called yidaki.

Made from a variety of different woods, the didjeridu is simply a hollow tube. The instruments played at Yirrkata today are generally 1.3 to 1.5 meters long and made from the narrow trunks of stringy bark eucalyptus (eucalyptus tetradonta). The instrument maker does not hollow the tube, but rather seeks out a tree which has already been eaten out by termites. After the tree is felled and a proper length removed from the bottom portion of it, the bark and outer layer of wood are peeled and cut away. Some smoothing out of the inner surface of the blowing end and optional decorative painting completes the construction of an instrument.

In traditional performance contexts, Yolngu do not ascribe tonal pitch value to the sound of the didjeridu or to the interval forming between the didjeridu and the singer's voice. Accordingly, the precise tuning of didjeridus is unimportant in Yolngu culture. I The fact that Yolngu do not ascribe specific tonal pitch value to the didjeridu does not mean that the instrument's sound quality is musically unimportant. At each step in the process of making an instrument, attention is given to providing a sound that is clear and resonant. This is seen both in the discarding of tree trunks determined to be too dry to produce a resonant sound and in the use of a knife to cut away the outer layers of wood, which renders a lighter, more resonant sound.2, 3

Different sets of playing techniques are found in cultures who use the didjeridu, but one universal technique is the production of a constant drone through the use of circular breathing. While blowing, the player retains small amounts of air in the cheeks; this air is then used to sustain the drone when taking quick breaths in through the nose. The basic blowing technique involves buzzing the lips in a way that is fairly analogous to Western brass instrument technique. One major difference is that the embouchure (the position and application of the lips on the mouthpiece of a wind instrument) of a didjeridu, while well-controlled, is less taut than the Western brass embouchure. The resulting greater flapping of the lips helps give the didjeridu its characteristic rich sound.4 Additional techniques characteristic of Yolngu didjeridu performance include blowing the first over- tone; diaphragmatic accents (which tend to raise the pitch of the fundamental slightly); various types of tonguing; and vocal sounds, such as singing and guttural shrieks. These techniques are used in different combinations, simulta- neously affecting rhythm and timbre.

Musicological writings about traditional use of the didjeridu have focused On the cultures of Arnhemland and Grooyte Eylandt. In this literature (Elkin and Jones 1958; Jones 1967 and 1973; Moyle 1974; Stubington 1978 and 1984) discussions of didjeridu style have generally served two ends. First, basic playing techniques and characteristic rhythmic patterns have been described. Second, these descrip- tions of technique and rhythm have been used to contrast the style of one didjeridu-playing culture with another. For example, the eastern Arnhem Land style, which features rhythmic alternation between the blown fundamental and blown first overtone, is distinguished from the western Arnhem Land style, which uses only the blown fundamental pitch but achieves rhythmic variation through control of vocal resonance.

Discussions along these lines provide broad cross-cultural comparisons of style, but they do not,explain stylistic variation within specific cultural areas. The stylistic use of the didjeridu by Yolngu players is particularly varied. Jones (1973) recognised this in stating that 'in the northeastern Arnhem Land area the various forms of blown overtone are added in, together with all the more western [Arnhem Land] techniques and the whole range of vocal effects already men- tioned, producing an amalgam of possibilities that itself divides into many sub-styles'. (273) The range of techniques and rhythms employed by the Yolngu is not only varied, but applied in consistently patterned ways. In order to better understand these patterns of stylistic variation, a distinction is made between style and determinants of style. Style refers to the physical aspects of a player's sound and technique, including the use of particular techniques, rhythmic pat- terns, timbral quality and overall rhythmic 'feet'. Determinants of style refers to factors of performance that are external to the actual production of sound, but which may influence the manner of playing. Examples include the symbolic meaning of certain sounds or particular performance protocols.

The first part of this paper is concerned with the use of the didjeridu in the traditional Yolngu ceremonial song genre ('clan songs'). Clan song performance comprises a complex musical system in which didjeridu style,is determined and organised by many factors. Didjeridu style inceremonial clan song performance will be discussed in terms of seven determinants: physical deten-ninants, pe r- formance protocols, ceremonial protocols, symbolic determinants, aesthetic. de- terrninants, developmental determinants and cross-cultural determinants. In the second part of the paper, some of the same determinants will be used to discuss didjeridu performance in the pop/rock songs of the Yolngu band Yothu Yindi. By contrasting the use of the didjeridu in these two different performance settings we may see both some of the changes brought about by the use of Yolngu didjeridu in a non-traditional context and some of the aspects of playing that carry over from the traditional to the commercial performance setting.

Yolngu clan songs

Yolngu clans (b'a'purru) are groups of patrilineally related kin. Each clan owns an ancestral estate comprised of land, songs, designs, sacred words, ceremonies and ceremonial paraphernalia. The ancestral songs performed at public portions of ceremonies such as funerals and male circumcisions are referred to (in musicological literature) as 'clan songs' because each clan is associated with its own song repertoire. Each clan song repertoire embodies the ancestral history of a given clan and is marked by distinctive thematic, textual and musical elements.

During clan song performance, variably sized groups of men sing and accompany themselves with pairs of hardwood clapsticks (biLma), while both women and men dance. The performance also includes the accompaniment of one male didjeriduist (yidakimi), most often a young adult or teenager.5 Ceremonial performances are built up from successions of hundreds of short verses (called yutunggurr, literally 'thigh'). Each verse typically lasts from fifteen seconds to a little over a minute and there are short periods of rest or conversation between each verse. The length of a given performance may vary from two or three hours to an entire day or evening, depending on the occasion.

Various ancestral spirit-beings associated with a given clan comprise the explicit subject matter of its songs. These spirit-beings include flora and fauna, natural phenomena such as clouds and wind, cultural artifacts (spears, canoe paddles, speech), great ancestral hunters and ordinary people. The words of each verse allude to some behaviour or quality of the spirit-being(s) in a particular ancestral context. The succession of song subjects over longer stretches of singing alludes to important events that occurred at particular places in the ancestral past.

Musically, clan song verses are commonly structured in three sections. In the first, introductory, section, the lead singer establishes the clapstick pattern, begins singing lines of text, or communicates (often in singing voice) information about the song to the other performers. The didjeriduist's entrance in this section often consists of a brief improvised passage that begins with one or two short staccato notes (a way of quickly adjusting the embouchure) and leads to a sustained note of variable length. While holding this sustained note the did- jeriduist mentally prepares to begin playing an appropriate rhythmic accompa- niment to the singer's melodic lines.

The second section comprises the main body of the verse. In its simplest form, this section involves a few lines of sung text accompanied by simple, unpattemed clapstick beating, an appropriate repetitive didjeridu pattern (vamp) and repeti- tive dance movements that represent some idiomatic behaviour or quality of the sung spirit-being. Frequently, the verse's main body is marked by a more complex inner structuring which might include the alternation between different slapstick and/or didjeridu patterns, the use of recurring vocal/instrumental re- frains and/or multi-sectioned choreographic movement. At the end of the main body of the verse, the clapstick beating, didjeridu playing and dancing all come to a synchronised halt. In the third, concluding, section of the verse, singers may continue to sing lines of text, at this point usually in less metrically-bound phrases.

Clan song verses are constructed extemporally during performance, drawing from established sets of key song words, clapstick patterns, didjeridu patterns and dance movements. Clan song performance involves a significant degree of improvisation, particularly on the part of the song leader, who controls the flow from one song subject to the next, the choice of clapstick pattern and other aspects of performance. The didjeriduist plays an important accompanying role in the clan song ensemble. Together with the singer's voice and clapsticks, the didjeriduist establishes the rhythmic foundation of the verse. He is also frequently responsible for cueing structural changes within the verse for the benefit of the other performers. The song leader, however, is ultimately responsible for the shape and direction of the performance. The song leader is often a respected elder or middle-aged clan leader with a large knowledge of song texts and musical patterns and the ability to organise performances involving many people and a voice that can hold up during many hours of daily performance. The younger didjeriduist may be appreciated and respected for his musical skills, but his role within the ensemble is clearly that of an accompanists

Within the role of accompanist, the didjeriduist has a degree of freedom in creating appropriate patterns for sung verse. In many cases the didjeriduist's improvisation consists of slight variations upon a brief repeating rhythmic figure, or vamp. One basic vamp and two syncopative variants are shown in Example 1. In an appropriate performance context, any of these rhythms would be interchangeable; the use of one or another would not effect the perception of stylistic difference. Stylistic difference - differences in the 'way of playing' - is regarded here in two senses. In one sense it can involve particular aspects of rhythm, timbre and technique that are determined by various ceremonial or performance protocols. In another sense, stylistic difference may involve more general characteristics in a player's rhythms, rhythmic feel, or technique.    


Example 1. Didjeridu vamp and variants.

Physical determinants of style

Both the physics of the instrument and human physiology are important stylistic determinants. Some of the physical characteristics of the instrument have been discussed above. The Yolngu's musical use of the didjeridu is impressively


Makuma Yunupingu of Yothu Yindi (1992)

creative, though by no means exhausts the sounding potential of the instrument. The western Arnhem Lander's rhythmic use of vocal resonance provides one example of didjeridu technique which is not emphasised by Yolngu players from northeast Arnhem Land. It is also possible to play the didjeridu in ways that are not part of any tradition toda . For example, on most didjeridus it is possible, by

tightening the lips, to blow two or more overtones above the two used by the Yolngu. Yolngu didjeridu players have developed and maintained a particular range of techniques that serves their functional and aesthetic musical needs.

Performance protocols as determinants of style

Some of the standard protocols of clan song performance directly influence certain aspects of didjeridu style. One of these involves the use of the blown overtone. In most clan song verses, the points where clapstick rhythmic changes take place and the point at which the instrumental parts come to a stop, are subject to performer discretion. In some circumstances the song leader or lead dancer provides these cues, but they are often given through the use of the blown overtone in the didjeriduist's part. In Transcriptions 1, 3 and 4 the overtone is used to cue the end of the instrumental and danced portion of the VerSe7 (nb. all transcriptions are positioned at the end of the chapter). These types of cadential patterns are so ingrained in clan song performance that they are often used even where performance cues are not strictly required; for example, in cases where a set number of beats determines the end of a verse.

In cases where the didjeriduist provides performance cues,- the song leader's preferences are still paramount. One of the didjeriduist'-s tasks as accompanist is to anticipate the number of vocal phrases the singer wishes to sing in a given verse. If the singer is unhappy with the point at which the didjeriduist cues the end of the verse, he may (during the break between verses) instruct the did- jeriduist to sustain verses for a longer or shorter period of time.8

Another standard performance protocol that affects didjeridu playing is that different types of rhythmic patterns are appropriate to different clapstick patterns. The song leader changes the clapstick pattern every few verses within constraints related to the song subject. His choice of clapstick pattern, in turn, partly determines the range of rhythmic patterns a didjeriduist may use. Verses using slow, unpattemed stick beating - which Yolngu refer to as bulnha bilma ('slow clapsticks') - require a particular type of ametric didieridu style. An instance of this is in Transcription 1, performed by Dhakaliny Yunupingu in 1990. One feature of rhythmic style with these slow stick patterns is that, in the absence of a regular meter, the singer's and didjeriduist's parts each cue forward motion in the other. Specifically, in the main body of the verse, the didjeriduist anticipates the onset of each new vocal phrase with two short notes (indicated by pairs of sixteenth notes in the transcription). The exact onset of new vocal phrases may, in turn, be influenced by the sounding of these two short didjeridu notes. (Note that the beginning of each vocal phrase in the verse's main body coincides with the didjeridu note immediately following the pair of sixteenth notes.)

This type of slow, unmetered clapstick rhythm is found in the repertoire of all

Yolngu clans. Analysis of recordings since 1952 indicate that didjeridu accom- paniments used to accompany this type of clapstick pattern are a well-conserved element of performance. Within this context there is room for only minor variation; for example, the use of one (versus two) brief notes in anticipation of a new vocal phrase. There are other classes of named stick patterns that are also accompanied by a restrictive range of didjeridu styles. These include yindi bilma ('big/important clapsticks', these are discussed in relation to ceremonial proto- col, below); and, to a lesser extent, ngarrunga bilma ('walking clapsticks'), which include a variety of patterned and unpattemed rhythms in moderate (i.e. 'walking') tempo.

Ceremonial protocols as determinants of style

During lengthy public ceremonies there are times when song performance accompanies specific ritual events and less formal periods when the singing (and dancing) is itself the main event. Both ceremonial contexts have ramifications for didjeridu style. At important junctures during ceremonies, only a narrow range of song subjects, clapstick patterns and didjeridu styles is appropriate. For example, one periodic ceremonial event, called gunbur'yun, involves the calling out by one or more mate performers of sacred names that connect Yolngu to totemic land sites. The songs that typically culminate in gunbur'yun are called yindi manikay ('big/important songs'). The clapstick pattern appropriate to both the act of gunbur'yun and the immediately preceding sung verses is called yindi bilma ('biglimportant clapsticks') and consists of rapid, unpattemed beating. The didjeridu pattern accompanying yindi manikay consists of a simple drone articu- lated by breaths (often pairs of breaths in quick succession) taken at fairly regular intervals, but without regard for the timing of the vocal or clapstick accents.

During less formal portions of ceremonies there are more opportunities for didjeriduists (as well as singers) to showcase more contemporary and/or personal styles. This may be seen especially in portions of informal performance devoted to 'newsong' verses (yuta manikay). Newsong verses comprise a unique sub- genre within clan song performance. Whereas all other clan song verses are believed to have been created by ancestral beings at the beginning of time and performed in the original manner to the present day, newsong verses are the acknowledged creations of Yolngu singers. Newsong verses are inspired by some contemporary event which, in the singer/composer's mind, is perceived in relation to an ancestral song subject. For example, on one occasion several years ago, a family got lost while driving home through the bush. This inspired the creation of a newsong verse concerning the ancestral dingo (who perennially wanders 'lost' through the bush). Innovative aspects of newsong verses may include invented text alluding to the contemporary event, new clapstick patterns and new rhythmic counterpoints worked out between singer and didjeriduist. New song verses are enjoyed by dancers and other ceremony attendees both because of their frequent rhythmic vitality and because of their longer duration (generally one minute or more, compared with fifteen to thirty seconds for most other verses).

Symbolic determinants of style

The sound of the didjeridu is usually heard as a simple rhythmic drone. At times, however, components of the sound - blown fundamental, blown overtone, or vocal effects - may take on specific symbolic meanings. For example, in particular contexts involving songs about Wuyal, the ancestral honey gatherer, the fundamental pitch of the didjeridu is understood to represent the drone of wild honey bees. In certain contexts, a long, blown overtone is sounded just prior to the start of each sung verse. Depending on the song subject involved, this sound could mean different things: for example, the cry of a dolphin or the call-to-performance of an ancestral didjeridu player associated with the Morning Star. An example of the latter may be seen in the long blown overtone at the beginning of the didjeridu part in Transcription 4. Short vocal shrieks produced simultaneously with the blown fundamental may be used at any time simply as means of creating rhythmic and timbral variety. When vocal shrieks are used in the accompaniment of text about any of a number of ancestral birds, the sound can be understood as symbolising the call of the given bird. Symbolic associa- tions such as those described here affect not only listeners' perceptions, but also the players' selective use of particular techniques and sounds to accompany certain song subjects.    

Aesthetic determinants of style

Some aspects of, the didjeridu's sound reflect personal or group aesthetics. Personal and group aesthetics may determine both the general 'groove' or feel of the basic rhythmic vamp (including the relative placement of overtone accents on top of or behind the beat) and the relative complexity of specific rhythmic figures. Some didjeriduists gain reputations as stylistic innovators and over time may influence others' playing. In more than one respect, singers' aesthetics also influence didjeridu style. Song leaders frequently dictate certain didjeridu pat- terns or ways of playing that they want to hear. At the same time, a lead singer may be more, or less, tolerant of young, didjeriduists' stylistic predilections. It is common for a didjeriduist to informally align himself, for a period of time, with specific singers. In this context, too, a singer may influence didjeridu style, because particular styles of playing will be worked out in the course of frequent improvisational and compositional collaboration. The degree of aesthetic open- ness or conservatism are traits that may also apply to entire clans. Some clans' newsong verse performances exhibit a wide range of clapstick patterns and didjeridu rhythms while other clans' newsong performances are more limited in their stylistic range.

Transcriptions 2 and 3 are excerpts from two performances of a newsong verse concerning an owl-like bird, tawny frogmouth. The two performances of Tawny Frogmouth, recorded thirty seven years apart, are by the same singer, Larrtjannga Ganambarr. This newsong verse was created in the mid-1930s by the singer's father. The two versions, though different in a number of respects, are identifiable as the same song by the use of a recurring three-bar refrain. The refrain is always sung on a single pitch (the tonic) and always contains the same text (texts are not indicated in these transcriptions). In both recordings the didjeriduist plays a different rhythmic pattern during the refrain than in the rest of the verse.

The earlier Tawny Frogmouth performance (Transcription 2) was recorded at Yirrkala in 1952 by Richard

Waterman. The didjeriduist, Djirrnini Yunupingu, was a renowned player during the 1950s who featured prominently in Water- man's recordings. One aspect of Djirmini's style is the alternate placement of overtone pitches at two eighth-note and three eighth-note intervals. The result is syncopated with respect to the regular two eighth-note figures of the singer. Another frequent, notable feature of Djirrnini's style (though not in the verse excerpted in Transcription 2) is a relaxed manner of playing and the use of light, distinctly behind-the-beat, blown overtones. These aspects of style may be heard in others' playing, too, from the 1950s through the present. The relaxed, behind- the-beat rhythmic feet is considered to be an older style of playing. It is rare in contemporary newsong performance which favours more precise, on-top-of-the- beat accompaniments.

The more recent Tawny Frogmouth performance (Transcription 3) was recorded in 1989. The didjeriduist, Gunybi Ganambarr, plays in a manner that is common in contemporary newsong accompaniments- the overtone is used for rhythmic syncopation, but the syncopation occurs within, rather than across, the beat; the rhythmic feel is not so relaxed as in the earlier recording; and the overtones are executed squarely in time.

Transcription 4 is of a complete newsong verse related to the 'Morning Star' song series, recorded in 1990. The didjeriduist, Dhakaliny Yunupingu, exhibits a style of playing that could be described as avant-garde. In the context of Yolngu didjeridu practice, the most striking aspect of Dhakaliny's style is the use of rapid staccato tonguing on the fundamentals Additionally, Dhakaliny's style is marked at specific points by a complex rhythmic counterpoint to the vocal line and by a generally driving, on-top-of-the-beat rhythmic feel. Dhakaliny's per- sonal aesthetic is readily discernible in the context of newsotig verses, but not in verses associated with the stylistically constrained 'slow' clapstick pattern (see Transcription 1).

Development determinants of style

The way that Yolngu learn to play the didjeridu may help to influence both conservative and innovative aspects of accompaniment style. On the side of conservatism, Yolngu are, from childhood, continually exposed to the stylistic models of their elders. Once a young player begins to perform in ceremony, he is continually guided by singers and more experienced players towards the correct (i.e. extant) ways of accompanying various clapstick patterns and vocal phrasings. On the side of innovation, the impact of self-training and peer group interaction are both relevant. Though didjeriduists do not generally perform at ceremonies until about age fourteen or fifteen, experience with the instrument begins as child's play much earlier. Boys. (and sometimes girls) as young as four or five may be seen ambling about blowing on small-scale instruments. Boys nearing performing age practice both traditional patterns they have memorised and new patterns of their own making. They accompany young would-be singers and, in informal technical duels with other young didjeriduists, they learn to push their skills and aesthetics to new limits. It may well be at this developmental stage that generational differences in style begin to take root.

Cross-cultural determinants of style

Since the establishment of a non-Aboriginal mining town (Nhutunbuy) near Yiffkala in the late 1960s, Western popular music (primarily in the form of commercial audio cassettes) has captivated Yolngu youth. Yolngu usually expe- rience Western pop music as passive listeners, though, on occasion, a young didjeriduist may sit alongside a stereo cassette player improvising rock and roll rhythms in accompaniment to popular music recordings. 10 We can only speculate about the influence that this type of experience has upon ceremonial didjeridu style. However, on more than one occasion, a Yolngu commentator criticised performance involving contemporary and exuberant vocal and didjeridu rhythms by referring to it disparagingly as 'rock and roll'. II It is hard to imagine that there would be no influence. At least to this author's ears, the rhythmically driving feel of many contemporary newsong verse accompaniments sound more in line with a pop/rock aesthetic than earlier, more relaxed styles of playing. Whatever the bases of the shift in didjeridu style, the change itself is purely at the aesthetic level. The technology of the instrument has not changed; neither have the basic playing techniques nor the role of the instrument within the performance ensem ble.

Yothu Yindi

Yothu Yindi is the most well known Aboriginal rock band in Australia today. Formed by Yolngu singer/songwriter Mandawuy Yunupingu in 1986, Yothu Yindi has achieved remarkable commercial and critical success for their culture- bridging, politically-conscious songs and performances. The band's members include Yolngu from Yirrkala and Galiwin'ku (another Yolngu settlement) as well as non-Aboriginal musicians. Their instrumentation combines standard pop/rock instruments (electric guitars, keyboards, drum kit) with Yolngu clap- sticks and didieridu. Yothu Yindi's recorded and live performances include songs in Yolngu dialects and in English, with musical influence from three istinct genres: pop/rockl2, clan songs and a Yolngu recreational song form called dja4pangarri. 13 Many of the band's songs are purely in one of these three styles, while some combine elements of more than one style.

The effect that performance context plays upon music style can be seen by considering the stylistic determinants in Yothu Yindi's didjeridu playing and in their selective use of the instrument. In the remainder of this section we will focus specifically on the stylistic use of the didjeridu in Yothu Yindi's pop/rock songs. These songs comprise the bulk of Yothu Yindi's recorded repertoires and (compared with the band's recording's of clan songs and djatangarri) provide the greatest contrast with didjeridu style in Yolngu ceremonial performance.

In Yothu Yindi's pop/rock material the use of the didjeridu is made to conform to the performance protocol and aesthetics of the pop/rock genre in several ways: by the subdued presence of the fundamental tone in the overall mix; post-record- ing re-tuning of the didjeridu's pitch; avoidance of the blown overtone; heavy reliance upon the use of vocal shrieks for rhythmic fills; and the use of a strictly metronomic rhythmic feel. One of the protocols of pop/rock musical perform- ance is the central role that the drums and bass guitar play in establishing the rhythmic feel of a song. The didjeridu and clapsticks would assume this role in clan song performance, but in the pop/rock context - particularly in sections where the bass guitar and lower-pitched drums are prominent - the didjeridu is relegated to a less central role within the ensemble.

Unlike the case with clan song verses where there is internal structural flexibility, all structural elements of Yothu Yindi's pop/rock songs are worked out prior to studio recording (perhaps with changes made in post-recording studio editing). In this context there is no need for the didjeridu to provide cues for other instruments. This is another reason for the didjeridu being less functionally important within the pop/rock performance context. Indeed some of Yothu Yindi's pop/rock songs do not use the didjeridu at all.

The lack of precise tuning, of the didjeridu's pitches is a normal'feature of traditional Yolngu song, but can cause problems in the pop/rock context. For non-Yolngu listeners, the presence of an arbitrarily pitched didjeridu together with electric guitars and bass could cause an unwanted perception of 'out of tunedness'. Because of this, in their pop/rock songs Yothu Yindi's studio engineers alter the pitch of the didjer-idu's blown fundamental technologically in order to bring it in line with the non-Aboriginal instruments (usually to match the tonic or fifth note of the scale). A perceived need to re-tune the didjeridu in the pop/rock context is evident in remarks by Mark Moffit, recording engineer and producer on Yothu Yindi's album Tribal Voice (I 99 1) 'when it's in tune it really makes a big difference with a rock track; when it's not it's a terrible sound' (cited in Neuenfeldt, 1993: 65).

The didjeridu's blown fundamental is treated in two ways in the pop/rock context. During portions of songs where the use of bass guitar is prominent the didjeridu is usually mixed down to the point of near or complete inaudibility. This allows the sound of the bass guitar line to come through unimpeded. By contrast, the rhythmic drone of the didjeridu is quite prominent in certain interludes where the bass guitar drops out. Thus, just as Yothu Yindi's entire repertoire is divided into traditional Yolngu and pop/rock songs, one finds that even within individual pop/rock songs music-stylistic distinctions can be made between sections that are more or less 'Yolngu-sounding'.

The didjeridu's blown overtone is scarcely heard in Yothu Yindi's pop/rock songs. As with the selective use of the blown fundamental, the even scarcer use of the blown overtone may relate to a desire to avoid conflict with the bass guitar. The blown overtone on Yolngu didjeridus tends to be an octave to a tenth above the fundamental (and so usually above the bass guitar range), but its sound would still conflict with the bass for two reasons. First, its tone, like that of the bass guitar, is deep and intense. Second, because the interval between the didjeridu's fundamental and overtone rarely corresponds to a Western tempered interval, it would be difficult to bring the didjeridu's fundamental and overtone pitches simultaneously in tune with the bass, keyboards and other guitars.

With the avoidance of the blown overtone and the restrictive use of the blown fundamental in Yothu Yindi's pop/rock material, the vocal shriek (superimposed on top of a scarcely audible blown fundamental or remixed together with a digitally sampled fundamental drone) is a major component in the band's didjeridu style. The sound of the vocal shriek is timbrally distinct but does not interfere with the primacy of the bass guitar/bass drum bottom. Two examples of Yothu Yindi's use of the vocal shriek may be seen in Transcriptions 5 and 6.15 Transcription 5 is excerpted from the opening portion of the song Dharpa (Yothu Yindi 1991). Following a one bar introduction consisting of six vocal shrieks, the didjeriduist forms a rhythmic line that combines the fundamental tone with vocal shrieks. At the twelfth bar there is a general shift in instrumental texture. Here the didjeriduist uses only the vocal shriek (though a sampled sustained drone is audible in the background). This eight-bar section ends with a build-up of rhythmic intensity in the final bar. Transcription 6 is excerpted from an instrumental interlude in the song Tribal Voice (Yothu Yindi 1991). Here the didjeriduist uses only the vocal shriek. As in the previous example, there is a rhythmic build-up in the final bar of the interlude. One innovation in this section involves the use of multi-tracked didjeridu: one instrument sounds in the right channel, the other in the left.

The use of 'behind-the-beat' and 'on-top-of-the-beat' rhythm are both well established in traditional clan song performance, but only metronomically pre- cise accompaniments are used in Yothu Yindi's pop/rock songs. In the popular music realm, metronomic rhythm is not only an aesthetic requirement, but a measure of a musician's competence. This view may be seen in Moffit's com- ments on Yothu Yindi's performance skills:

... they are the heavyweight traditional musicians up there [Arnhem Land]; they're recognised as the leader and they play all the ceremonies. I've heard didjs before and it's quite easy for the player to get behind, to drag and this guy didn't ... (cited in Neuenfeldt, 1993: 66).

Although Yothu Yindi does not perform at traditional Yolngu ceremonies, some of the, musical decisions made by the band may be seen as following the same ,ancestral law' that guides traditional decision making. This includes making an effort to consult with and gain consensus among all interested parties before reaching important decisions.16 In the case of Yothu Yindi this has involved consulting with clan elders regarding certain elements of their performances; for example, in order to gain permission to use ceremonial feathered headdresses in their stage shows. 17 At the same time, in order to 'cross over' into the commercial music arena, the band has consulted and worked with people who have experi- ence and vested interests in commercial record production and distribution. Here, as we have seen, the perceptions and judgements of others working with the band (such as studio recording engineers and their perceptions of didjeridu pitch) have influenced Yothu Yindi's use of the instrument.

Didjeridu style in Yothu Yindi's pop/rock work is largely disconnected from the wide range of ancestral spirit-related symbolic associations found in ceremonial performance contexts (usually the calls of specific birds or animals). But in this same context there is a new, non-traditional association connected with the didjeridu's sound: for Yothu Yindi's non-Yolngu listeners, the didjeridu pro- vides one of the main signifiers of the band's Yolngu identity.

Yothu Yindi's didjeriduists all learned to play the instrument in its traditional context long before Yothu Yindi was formed. These same musicians were also exposed to Western popular music from an early age. In this sense they, like all Yolngu, are bi-musical. The possible influence of Western popular music upon didjeridu playing in ceremonial clan song performance has already been dis- cussed. In the traditional performance realm, such influences would be con- strained by the need for the didjeridu's sound (and style) to support all of the traditional aspects of the performance genre (the need for structural cueing, the need to be aesthetically acceptable to elder singers, etc.).

In the popular music context, Yothu Yindi has been able to use the didjeridu in ways that would not be possible in traditional performance contexts. As we have seen, some of the band's contemporary didjeridu stylings involve the preference for certain traditional techniques (such as vocal shrieks) over others, the exclu- sive use of on-top-of-the-beat rhythmic feel and the alteration or extension of the didjeridu's sound through technological means. But the basic range of traditional Yolngu playing techniques has so far proven more than adequate for the purpose of performance with Yothu Yindi.

Conclusions

We have looked at several levels of clan song performance at which didjeridu style may be determined. These interrelated determinants are not an exhaustive set, but are simply intended to provide some filters through which the complexity of didjeridu style may be viewed. It is clear that Yolngu didjeridu style does not involve a single manner of playing. Rather, it is a variable aspect of performance, determined by aesthetic, functional and symbolic factors. In traditional clan song performance, didjeriduists (and other performers) enjoy a degree of creative freedom, yet the genre has, on the whole, proven to be a robustly conservative cultural practice. By restricting the contexts in which innovative performance may take place, Yolngu limit the effect of stylistic variation upon the musical system. The result of this circumscription is that the greatest degree of stylistic change affects the aesthetic realm of performance. By contrast, the functional and symbolic aspects of performance appear to remain constant.

In a number of ways, Yothu Yindi's adaptations to the pop/rock performance context can also be viewed with respect to traditional circumscription of musical style. In their pop/rock songs the possibility of multitrack recording and digital sampling and processing have allowed the didjeridia to be used in some very un-traditional ways. Similarly, aesthetic problems related to combining the didjeridu with Western pop instruments have influenced the more prominent use of vocal sounds. Neither of these factors, however, have altered the basic range of techniques found in traditional performance.

The circumscription of didjeridu style in Yothu Yindi's work can also be seen in the fact that their repertoire includes the use of traditional genres alongside (and sometimes within) pop/rock songs. In Yothu Yindi's recordings of clan songs and dja4pangarri the use of the didjeridu is more or less the same as in traditional contexts. For young Yolngu listeners, there may be a double-sided message in this, namely, that pop/rock songs may provide an appropriate avenue for bridging cultures and experimenting with very new performance ideas; but traditional songs and performance - including didjeridu accompaniments - will remain strong and viable, even as Yolngu actively engage themselves in the creation of commercial music products.

Notes on music transcription

In Transcriptions 1-4, the vocal parts are given without texts on a six-line staff. The six-note scale upon which the vocal melodies are constructed does not correspond to Western scales because Yolngu tuning is both non-tempered and variable (i.e. the precise tuning of intervals need not be exactly the same from verse to verse or from performance to performance), Without concern for exact tuning measurements, the six lines of the staff represent each of the six discrete scale steps. The notes represented by the top and bottom lines of the staff are approximately an octave apart. The uneven spacing of the staff lines visually reflects the alternately large and small scale steps that comprise the scale. The sizes of these scale steps often roughly correspond to 3 and 11/2 Western semi-tones, respectively. The vocal part in Transcriptions I and 4 use all six notes of the scale; the vocal parts in Transcriptions 2 and 3 use only the bottom three notes of the scale. For purposes of reference, approximate Western tunings of the vocal parts in these particular recordings are given on a standard five-line staff at the beginning of Transcriptions 1-4. Upward and downward arrows here indicate microtonal deviations of less than 1/4 tone from standard Western pitch.

All didjeridu parts are notated on two lines. The blown fundamental appears on the bottom line; the blown overtone on the top line. Circled noteheads indicate vocal shrieks sounding together with the blown fundamental. Dashed slurs in the didjeridu parts indicate the use of subtle, untongued articulation. In these cases, rhythms are created solely by changes in air pressure and shape of the oral cavity. For purposes of reference, approximate Western tunings of the didjeridu parts are given on a standard five-line staff at the beginning of Transcriptions 1-4. No didjeridu tunings are indicated in Transcriptions 5 and 6. In these excerpts the pitch of the blown fundamental is inaudible and no blown overtones were used.

In Transcription I only, vocal phrases are indicated by notes connected to a single beam. Beams do not indicate rhythm per se, but rather connect all the notes sung in one breath. Rhythmic notation of the didjeridu part in Transcription I is approximate and intended primarily as an indication of accented note grouping. Visual alignment of noteheads (vertically between the three parts and horizon- tally within parts) indicates relative attack points and durations of notes.

In Transcription 1, crescendo/decrescendo markings in the didjeridu part do not refer to dynamics, but rather to the relative amount of vocal resonance. The more vocal resonance that is used, the richer and buzzier is the resulting tone. In Transcriptions I and 4, double bar lines indicate the dividing points between introduction and main body and between main body and vocal coda. The Tawny Frogmouth newsong verse excerpted in Transcriptions 2 and 3 incorporates a verse/refrain structure. In Transcriptions 2 and 3, the double bar lines indicate the dividing points between verses and refrains. In Transcription 2, bracketed bars in the didjeridu part contain only approximate note values due to the lack of clarity in the original sound recording.

The transcriptions in this article were prepared with Coda Music Technology's Finale versions 3.2 and 3.5 for Windows.

Acknowledgement: The fieldwork for this study was generously supported by a Fulbright Award for Australia, research grants from the Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies and an Andrew Mellon Predoctoral Fellowship. I would like to thank Gail Rein for commenting on an earlier draft of this paper.    


 
 


 
 


 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 

Notes

1. An analogous situation in Western music may be seen in the use of bongos or conga drums. These instruments produce quite audibly distinct pitches, yet we have trained ourselves to ignore the potential tonal relationship between these drums and other instruments in an ensemble. Instead we hear these pairs of drums as producing only relative 'high' and 'low' notes.

2. Didjeriduists in the Yirrkala area sometimes give pet names to instruments which acknow- ledge the sound quality of the instrument through association with an ancestral being. Magowan (1994), in discussing the naming of didjeridus in the Yolngu community at Galiwin'ku, notes that one didjeridu was named for the Olive Python, Wititj, because 'the twisted trunk of the tree was said to resemble the snake's body and the. deep pitch could be likened to the deep and very powerful sound of the snake heard in the thunder ... [Another didjeridu] was named after a large swamp bird, the brolga, Gudurrku, as the player could produce a resonant brolga call from it' (283-284).

3. Tuning measurements of a dozen didjeridus recorded in the Yirykala area in 1989-90 and 1952 show a range of fundamental pitches from 77 Hz (equivalent to a slightly lowered E flat one line below the bass clef) to 99 Hz (a slightly raised G on the bottom line of the bass clef). The intervals formed between fundamentals and first overtones ranged from 1226 cents (a slightly wide octave) to 1686 cents (a slightly flat perfect 12th), with the most common intervals falling in the range between a minor 9th and a neutral 10th.

There is no indication that instrument makers test for specific musical intervals when looking for and constructing didjeridus. The approximate range of the fundamental pitch might be important, however, since very low-pitched instruments (which tend to be longer and have wider bores) require more air and are thus more difficult to play and because the overtone on very high pitched instruments may involve too much air resistance for the purpose of making graceful transitions between the overtone and fundamental pitches. There also seems to be some correlation between the relative height of fundamental pitches and the intervals between fundamental and overtone pitches. Specifically, the instruments with lower-pitched funda- mentals tend towards slightly wider fundamental/overtone intervals while the instruments with lower-pitched fundamentals tend towards smaller fundamental/overtone intervals.

4. Wiggins (1985) discusses the role that 'loud, harsh' lip buzzing, vocal resonance and the naturally convoluted inner surface of the tube play with respect to the didjeridu's prominent high overtones and inharmonic formants.

5. At certain points during ceremonies, women perform clan songs as ritualised wailing, called ngdtji ('crying'). Ngdtji is performed by a group of women without clapsticks, dancing, or didjeridu accompaniment.

6. Some young men, through their clan lineage and/or song related skills, go on to become song leaders. For them, a period of time spent accompanying elder singers serves as an apprentice- ship in singing and song leadership.

7. Unless otherwise noted, all transcriptions are from recordings made in the Yirrkala area in 1989-90 by the author.

8. The above discussion has focused on particular functional uses of the didjeridu's overtone. The reader should not infer from this that the didjeriduist's use of the overtone is completely determined by performance protocol, as this is certainly not the case. Throughout the main body of a song verse, alternation between the blown fundamental and overtone may be used to create rhythmic variety and in this sense the way that a player uses the overtone (as well as vocal shrieks) is very much a matter of personal style.

9. The assessment of these rapid staccato figures as strikingly unusual is based both on my own perceptions of Gakaliny's playing and on comments made to me by two other Yolngu didjeriduists.

10. Observed during my stay at Yirrkala in 1989-90.

11. Ibid.

12. The term 'pop/rock' is intended broadly to include all styles of English language songs - from country western and folk to heavy metal - that are disseminated via commercial recordings in Northern Australia.

13. Djatpangarri is a song form that developed at Yirrkala during the Mission era (late 1930s through early 1970s). In contrast to the religious, ceremonial nature of clan songs, djatpan- garri songs are purely recreational in nature. Originally performed by young men at im- promptu concerts at Yirrkala's beach carnp, the subject matter of djaipangarri simultaneously concern a variety of everyday or contemporary phenomena (birds, the sea tide, cricket players, stage comics) while alluding to personal relations between individuals through reference to the names of particular secondary kinship groups (malk) that the individuals belong to.

14. Sixteen of the twenty nine songs included on theyothu Yindi albums Tribal Voice and Freedom are in a pop/rock musical style. The styles used in the remaining songs include clan song (6), djatpangarri (2), pop/rock and djaipangarri combined (3) and pop/rock and clan song combined (2).

15. The didjeriduists credited on the albums Tribal Voice (199 1) and Freedom (1993) are Makuma Yunupingu, Bunimbirr Marika and Milkayngu Mununggurr.

16. Williams (1985 and 1986) has discussed the importance of consensus-building among interested parties in Yolngu decision-making.

17. Mandawuy Yunupingu, personal correspondence with the author, 1990.

Bibliography

Elkin A. and Jones T. (1958) Arnhem Land Music Sydney: Oceania Monographs n9.

Jones T. (1967) 'The Didjeridu: Some Comparisons of Its Typology and Musical Functions with Similar Instruments Throughout the World', Studies in Music vl.

Jones T. (1973) 'The Yiraki (Didjeridu) in North-Eastern Arnhem Land: Techniques and Styles' in Berndt R. and Phillips E. (eds) The Australian Aboriginal Heritage: An Introduction through the Arts, Sydney: Australian Society for Education through the Arts in Association with Ure Smith.

Knopoff S. (1992) 'Yula Manikay: Juxtaposition of Ancestral and Contemporary Elements in the Performance of Yolngu Clan Songs', Yearbookfor Traditional Music n24.

Magowan F. (1994) 'Melodies of Mourning', (unpublished D Phil thesis, Oxford University).

Moyle A. (1974) North Australian Music: A Taxonomic Approach to the Study ofaboriginal Song Performances, (unpublished) Ph.D. thesis, Melbourne: Monash University.

Moyle A. (I 98 1) 'The Australian Didjeridu: A Late Musical Intrusion' World Archaeology vl2 n3.

Neuenfeldt K. (1993) 'The Didjeridu and the Overdub: Technologising and Transposing Aural Images of Aboriginality' Perfect Beat, vt n2.

Stubington J. (I 978) Yolngu Manikay: Modern Performances of Australian Aboriginal Clan

Songs Ph.D. thesis, Monash University.

Stubington J. (1984) 'Review of Djambidj: An Aboriginal Song Series From Northern Australia' Australian Aboriginal Studies, v 1.

Waterman R. (1952) Yirrkata Field Recordings - n3imeo (copies held at the Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canbeff a).

Wiggins G. (1985) The Physics of the Didjeridu (unpublished manuscript, Boston University, College of Liberal Arts).

Williams N. M. (I 985) 'On Aboriginal Decision-Making' in Barwick D. Beckett J and Reay, M (eds) Metaphors of Interpretation:Essays in Honour of W. E. H. Stanner, Canberra: Australian National University.

Williams N. M. (1986) The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and the Fight for its Recognition Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

Discography

Yothu Yindi Tribal Voice, Mushroom Records 1991

Yothu Yindi, Freedom, Mushroom Records 1994.